ABSTRACT
Compared to other respiratory viruses, the proportion of hospitalizations due to SARS-CoV-2 among children is relatively low. While severe illness is not common among children and young individuals, a particular type of severe condition called multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) has been reported. The aim of this prospective cohort study, which followed a group of individuals under the age of 19, was to examine the characteristics of patients who had contracted SARS-CoV-2, including their coexisting medical conditions, clinical symptoms, laboratory findings, and outcomes. The study also aimed to investigate the features of children who met the WHO case definition of MIS-C, as well as those who required intensive care. A total of 270 patients were included between March 2020 and December 2021. The eligible criteria were individuals between 0-18 with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection at the Infectious Disease Hospital "Prof. Ivan Kirov"in Sofia, Bulgaria. Nearly 76% of the patients were <= 12 years old. In our study, at least one comorbidity was reported in 28.1% of the cases, with obesity being the most common one (8.9%). Less than 5% of children were transferred to an intensive care unit. We observed a statistically significant difference in the age groups, with children between 5 and 12 years old having a higher likelihood of requiring intensive care compared to other age groups. The median values of PaO2 and SatO2 were higher among patients admitted to the standard ward, while the values of granulocytes and C-reactive protein were higher among those transferred to the intensive care unit. Additionally, we identified 26 children who met the WHO case definition for MIS-C. Our study data supports the evidence of milder COVID-19 in children and young individuals as compared to adults. Older age groups were associated with higher incidence of both MIS-C and ICU admissions.Copyright © 2023 P. Velikov et al., published by Sciendo.
ABSTRACT
Background: Studies suggest perinatal infection with SARSCoV- 2 can induce adverse birth outcomes, but studies published to date have substantial limitations. Most have identified cases based upon their presentation for clinical care, and very few have examined pandemic-related stress which may also impact adverse birth outcomes. Objective(s): To evaluate the relationships between SARSCoV- 2 infection in pregnancy and pandemic-related stress with birth outcomes. Study Design: We conducted an observational study of 211 mother-newborn dyads in three urban cohorts participating in the Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program. Serology for SARS-CoV-2 was assessed in a convenience sample of prenatal maternal, cord serum or dried blood spots from births occurring between January 2020-September 2021. Specimens were assessed for IgG, IgM, and IgA antibodies to nucleocapsid, S1 spike, S2 spike, and receptor-binding domain. A Pandemic-related Traumatic Stress (PTS) scale was based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition Acute Stress Disorder criteria. Result(s): 36% were positive for at least one antibody type, chiefly IgG. Self-report of infection was not significantly correlated with combined serology. There were no differences in gestational age (GA), birth weight, preterm birth (PTB), or low birth weight (LBW) among seropositive mothers. However, IgM seropositive mothers had children with lower BW (434g, 95% CI: 116- 752), BW Z score-for-GA (0.73 SD, 95% CI 0.10-1.36) and were more likely to deliver preterm (OR 8.75, 95% CI 1.22-62.4). Associations with LBW sustained in sensitivity analyses limited to pre-vaccine samples, and PTS symptoms were not associated with birth outcomes. The addition of PTS did not substantially change associations with BW, although associations with PTB attenuated to near-significance. Conclusion(s): We identified decreased birth weight and increased prematurity in mothers IgM seropositive to SARS-CoV-2, independent of PTS. Though there are limits to interpretation, the data support efforts to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infections in pregnancy.
ABSTRACT
Gallstone disease with advanced symptoms is one of the common abdominal emergencies during pregnancy and it is considered to be one of the most frequently reported non-obstetric surgical conditions in pregnant women. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of surgical cholecystectomy in pregnant women with symptoms of advanced gallstones. This is a retrospective analysis of 2814 pregnant women who attended various wards in government and private hospitals in the governorates of Diyala and Kirkuk in Iraq for more than 2 years, between February 2020 and June 2022. The hospital database was used to confirm the diagnosis of advanced gallstone symptoms in these pregnant women. The incidence of symptomatic gallstones in pregnant women, diagnosis and method of therapeutic management, cholecystectomy according to the pregnancy periods, and perinatal complications of patients according to therapeutic methods were determined. The results confirmed that out of 2814 pregnancies, only 126 (4%) had symptoms of gallstones. It was found that the majority of cases 67 (53%) were within the first trimester of pregnancy and the least 29 (23%) was observed in the second trimester. Acute cholecystitis was the generality 84 (67%) diagnosed in pregnant women with symptomatic gallbladder disease and only 9 (7%) of the patients had undergone prenatal cholecystectomy versus 117 (93%) who were managed conservatively. A total of 20 (16%) cases with undesirable complications were recorded, where 12 cases with low birth weight were noted, where 4 of them underwent surgery and 8 were treated conservatively. It was concluded that a large proportion of women suffer from symptoms of gallstones during pregnancy. Most cases can be managed conservatively, and intervention should be performed as often as needed.Copyright © 2023, Codon Publications. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Problem: Several large studies have demonstrated that COVID-19 pregnant individuals are at a significant risk for severe disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes. The mechanisms underlying these phenomena remain to be elucidated and are the focus of our project. Although fetal and placental infection is rare, placental abnormalities and adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with placental dysfunction in COVID-19 cases have been widely reported. In particular, placental thrombosis and lesions consistent with maternal vascular malperfusion (MVM) of the placenta are common in individuals with COVID-19. Since thrombotic complications have been associated with COVID-19, it is not surprising that pregnant individuals with COVID- 19 are at risk for placental thrombosis. Method of Study: Placentas were evaluated histologically. Extracellular vesicles were isolated by serial centrifugation. Result(s): Adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with these placental lesions, including hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (gestational hypertension and preeclampsia), small for gestational age (SGA, birthweight < 10th percentile for gestational age), and preterm birth (PTB, < 37 weeks) are significantly increased among pregnant individuals with COVID-19. Placental infection with SARSCoV- 2 is uncommon, but multiple inflammatory and metabolic factors are likely to affect the placenta, including circulating extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from various organs that have been associated with COVID-19 pathology and disease severity.We have analyzed over 500 placentas from COVID-19 pregnancies and found marked changes in placental morphology, characterized by abnormal maternal and fetal vessels, intervillous thrombi, and fibrin deposition, even in the face of mild or asymptomatic disease. We detected increased levels of small EVs in maternal serum from COVID-19 cases compared to controls and increased levels of mitochondrial DNA in EVs from COVID-19 cases. In in vitro experiments, we found increased oxidative stress in uterine endothelial cells and primary trophoblasts. Syncytialization of trophoblast cells following exposure to EVs from pregnant COVID-19 patients was markedly reduced. RNAseq of trophoblast cells exposed to EVs from pregnant COVID-19 patients revealed disruption of multiple pathways related to mitochondria function, oxidative stress, coagulation defects, and inflammation. Timing of infection during pregnancy (first, second, and third trimester) altered EV size distribution, cargo content, and functional consequences of trophoblast EV exposure. Conclusion(s): Our studies show that COVID-19 infection during pregnancy has profound effects on placenta morphology and function. It remains to be determined what the long-term consequences are on the offspring.
ABSTRACT
Aim: Standard diagnosis of gestational diabetes (GDM) is based on the Oral Glucose Tolerance test (OGTT). During the Covid-19 outbreak, due to Covid restrictions, criteria were modified i.e Fasting Blood Glucose >=5.3 and/ or HbA1c >= 39 for diagnosis of GDM. After the lifting of the Covid restrictions, the standard criteria were reimplemented and on analyzing the data, it was highlighted that some of the patients could have tested negative for GDM based on Covid Criteria. Method(s): We analyzed the data of 43 patients based on standard criteria (OGTT and HbA1c) after Covid restrictions, with the following results. Result(s): 11/43(28%) patients who were diagnosed on the basis of standard criteria could have been missed based on Covid criteria. Out of 11 deliveries, 2 babies with weight above 4 kg. There were no admissions to NICU. One patient had postpartum hemorrhage with 670 mL of blood loss. Conclusion(s): This was a retrospective study in which we analyzed the data of 45 pregnant females diagnosed with GDM based on testing using the Covid criteria and compared this to 43 pregnant females who were diagnosed with GDM on the basis of OGTT based on GOLD standard NICE criteria. In addition, we also examined maternal and obstetric outcomes in both groups such as the mode of delivery, the baby's birth weight, the incidence of shoulder dystocia, mean blood loss (MBL), and NICU admission. We understand that Covid GDM diagnosis was a necessity of time. In this study, we want to learn what could have been missed with that diagnostic criteria. For future pandemics, we need to revise our diagnostic criteria to avoid the risk of underdiagnosing GDM and associated complications.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2/COVID-19 infection is still a global concern, with pregnant women are considered as vulnerable population. Until now, the characteristics of pregnant women in Indonesia who are infected with COVID-19, as well as pregnancy and neonatal outcomes, are still unknown. This study aims to obtain national data, which are expected to be useful for the prevention and management of COVID-19 in pregnant women in Indonesia. Method(s): There were 1,427 patients recruited in this retrospective multicenter study. This study involved 11 hospitals in 10 provinces in Indonesia and was carried out using secondary patient data from April 2020 to July 2021. COVID-19 severity was differentiated into asymptomatic-to-mild symptoms and moderate-to-severe symptoms. The collected data include maternal characteristics, laboratory examinations, imaging, pregnancy outcomes, and neonatal outcomes. Result(s): Leukocyte, platelets, basophil, neutrophils segment, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), C-reactive protein (CRP), urea, and creatinine were found to be significantly associated with severity differences (p < 0.05). Moderate-severe symptoms of COVID-19 also shown to have suggestive pneumonia findings on chest X-ray findings. Patients with asymptomatic-to-mild symptoms had significantly (p < 0.001) higher recovery rate, shorter hospital stay, less intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and had more vaginal delivery. Neonates from mother with mild symptoms also had significantly (p < 0.001) higher survival rate, higher birth weight, and higher APGAR score. Conclusion(s): Several laboratory and radiology components, as well as maternal and neonatal outcomes are related to the severity of COVID-19 in pregnant women in Indonesia.Copyright © The Author(s). 2023.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: During the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, policies were implemented that sought to reduce in-person prenatal visits and ultrasounds. We sought to evaluate the effect of those policies on the rate of diagnosed fetal growth restriction and infant low birth weight. METHODS: We performed a cohort study of patients delivered at an academic center. Participants who received prenatal care during the time period of restricted visits were matched in a 1:1 ratio to patients receiving care during an equivalent time period when there were no such restrictions (group I: July 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019;and group II: March 23, 2020, to September 23, 2020). Medical records were reviewed for clinical and demographic characteristics. Neonatal morbidity was defined as any of the following: stillbirth, neonatal death, preterm birth, neonatal intensive care unit admission, low birth weight. Data were analyzed using chi-square and Mann-Whitney U test where appropriate. P <.05 was significant. RESULTS: Our cohort included 580 patients. Overall, the group had a 13% preterm birth rate, 8.2% were diagnosed with fetal growth restriction, and 26% had the composite neonatal morbidity. All patients in the cohort had at least one ultrasound. Compared to group I, group II had more individuals who had only one ultrasound during the pregnancy (3.1 versus 0%, P =.004), but overall the group had more total ultrasounds performed (1.5 [1–3] versus 1 [1–2], P =.02) and had more patients who required fetal surveillance for maternal and fetal conditions (56 versus 44, P =.014). Group II was more likely to have a neonatal demise (1.4 versus 0.3%, P <.01), but there was no difference in the rate of prenatal diagnosis of fetal growth restriction or low birth weight. CONCLUSION: Policies to reduce prenatal ultrasounds were not effective in reducing ultrasounds performed, and there was no difference in the diagnosis of fetal growth restriction despite an increase in comorbidity. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Obstetrics & Gynecology is the property of Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)
ABSTRACT
Background: External natural events, such as hurricanes, floods, and the COVID-19 pandemic can contribute to increased populational stress, especially for pregnant persons. Exposure to crises can produce short- and longterm health effects on pregnant persons and their offspring. There has been much interest in the association between maternal depression, anxiety, and stress during pregnancy and perinatal outcomes such as preterm birth (PTB) and low birth weight (LBW), before and since the COVID-19 pandemic, however results are controversial. Objective(s): Assess the association between prenatal mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic and preterm birth (delivery <37 weeks gestation) and low birthweight (<2,500 grams). Method(s): Pregnant individuals, >18 years, were recruited in Canada and provided data through a web-based questionnaire. We analyzed data on persons recruited between 06/2020-08/2021 who completed questionnaires while pregnant and two months post-partum. Data on maternal sociodemographics, comorbidities, medication use, mental health (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, General Anxiety Disorder-7, stress), pandemic hardship (CONCEPTION - Assessment of Stress from COVID-19), and on gestational age at delivery and birth weight, were selfreported. Crude and adjusted relative risks (aRR) with 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were calculated to quantify the association between PTB/LBW and maternal mental health. Result(s): A total of 1,265 and 1,233 participants were included in the analyses of PTB and LBW, respectively. No associations between PTB and prenatal mental health (depression [aRR 1.01, 95%CI 0.91-1.11], anxiety [aRR 1.04, 95%CI 0.93-1.17], stress [aRR 0.88, 95%CI 0.71-1.10], nor hardship [aRR 1.00, 95%CI 0.96-1.04]) after adjusting for potential confounders. The risk of PTB was increased with nonwhite ethnicity/race (aRR 3.85, 95%CI 1.35-11.00), consistently with the literature. Similar findings were observed for LBW (depression [aRR 1.03, 95%CI 0.96- 1.13], anxiety [aRR 1.05, 95%CI 0.95-1.17], COVID stress [aRR 0.92, 95%CI 0.77-1.09], or overall hardship [aRR 0.97, 95%CI 0.94-1.01]). Conclusion(s): No association was found between prenatal mental health nor hardship during the COVID-19 pandemic and the risk of PTB or LBW. However, it is imperative to continue the follow-up of mothers and their offspring to detect long-term health problems early.
ABSTRACT
Donated human milk is the best substitute for breast milk in the case when the mother cannot feed her baby. Human milk banks provide safe and high quality donated human milk. That was the reason why the Human Milk Bank was established in the Croatian Tissue and Cell Bank at the Zagreb University Hospital Centre in January 2020. The Bank works in accordance with the Law on the Application of Human Tissues and Cells. In this paper, we present the results of the Bank work since from its opening until June 2020. Due to logistic reasons caused by the COVID-19 epidemic and the earthquake in Zagreb, the Human Milk Bank did not collect milk for 43 days. Milk was donated by 31 mothers. Their median age was 31 years and 81% of them had high education level. In 52% of cases, mothers started donating milk three months after giving birth. Most donors donated milk only once (45%). The median period of donation was 46 days. The majority (52%) of donors gave birth for the first time, in the expected term of childbirth (94%), birth weight was >2500 g. Only three of donors' children (9%) were in intensive care. A total of 175.5 L of milk were collected (mean 5.7 L per donor), of which 151.5 L met the requirements of input quality control, and 141 L were pasteurized. A critical number of viable aerobic and facultative bacteria were identified in 32.6% of milk pools prepared for pasteurization, and 8.9% after pasteurization. For clinical use, 78.7 L were dispensed in three neonatal intensive care units. The Human Milk Bank has already shown the importance of its activities during the first months of operation. In order to be able to meet the needs for donated human milk at the national level, it is necessary to constantly inform mothers about the importance of human milk and to promote its donation.Copyright © 2020 Croatian Paediatric Society. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The physiological changes in the respiratory and cardiovascular systems in the immunosuppressed state of pregnancy may exacerbate clinical features and deteriorate outcomes due to COVID-19 infection. We aimed to compare the maternal and neonatal adverse effects in the first and second COVID-19 waves. Methodology: This study was a prospective cohort study conducted in a tertiary care COVID-19-dedicated hospital. In total, 104 (group A) and 96 (group B) COVID-19-positive pregnant women admitted during the first and second waves, respectively, were included in the study. Data on baseline variables, associated comorbidities, clinical presentations, management strategies, and neonatal and maternal outcomes were collected and compared using parametric and nonparametric tests and analyzed. Result(s): Around 2.08% in group A and 6.72% in group B of COVID-19-infected pregnant women, respectively, had moderate-to-severe disease and required intensive care unit stay. Almost 1.04% in group A and 3.84% in group B had maternal mortality, 13.4% and 19.8% babies of groups A and B required admission in neonatal intensive care units, and 8.6% and 7.3% of newborns in groups A and B had COVID-19-positive reports by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) at birth, respectively. Of them, 2.1% newborns in group B had RT-PCR positive on day 7 of life and beyond, whereas none had positive RT-PCR reports on 7 days and beyond in group A. Conclusion(s): Dreadful maternal outcomes like requirement of ICU and mechanical ventilator and persistence of neonatal infections were higher during the second wave.Copyright © The Author(s). 2023.
ABSTRACT
Background and objective Growth charts are important in monitoring the growth of neonates. The growth of Indian fetuses is understood to be different from the Western population due to multiple factors. In this study, we aimed to analyze the utility of the application of various growth charts in evaluating the birth weights of liveborn neonates at a tertiary teaching hospital. Methodology A total of 729 liveborn neonates between 24 to 42 weeks of gestation delivered at the study institute during the study period were included. Birth weights were plotted on three growth charts - Fenton 2013, INTERGROWTH-21st (IG-21), and Kandraju et al. chart - and classified as small for gestational age (SGA), or appropriate for gestational age (AGA), or large for gestational age (LGA) according to the respective centiles and sex. The incidences of SGA and LGA were calculated with respect to various charts and compared. Statistical analysis was done using the McNemar Chi-square test for paired categorical variables. Cohen's kappa (K) was used to analyze the concordance between the growth charts. A p-value <0.005 was considered statistically significant. Results Among 668 term neonates, the number of neonates classified as SGA was 313 (46.86%), 236 (35.33%), and 219 (32.78%) according to Fenton 2013, IG-21, and Kandraju et al. chart respectively. The difference in incidences of SGA between Fenton 2013 and IG-21 for term neonates was significant (p=0.0001). The difference between incidences of SGA among term neonates according to Fenton 2013 and Kandraju et al. and IG-21 vs. Kandraju et al. was significant (p=0.0001). Among 61 preterm neonates, the number of neonates classified as SGA was 15, 11, and five according to Fenton 2013, IG-21, and Kandraju et al. respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the three charts. Among 729 neonates, the number of neonates classified as LGA was 10 (1.37%), 22 (3.02%), and 32 (4.39%) according to Fenton 2013, IG-21, and Kandraju, et al. respectively. The difference in incidences of LGA between Fenton 2013 and IG-21 was significant (p=0.0015). The difference in incidences of LGA between Fenton 2013 and Kandraju et al. was significant (p=0.0001). The difference in incidences of LGA between IG-21 and Kandraju et al. was also significant (p=0.0044). Conclusion Fenton 2013, IG-21, and Kandraju et al. growth charts vary significantly in detecting the incidence of SGA and LGA among term neonates. Among term neonates, IG-21 and Kandraju et al. growth charts are comparable in terms of the estimation of SGA. The Fenton 2013 growth chart showed a higher incidence of SGA among term neonates. The incidence of LGA was highest according to Kandraju et al. growth chart and least according to Fenton 2013. Among preterm neonates, the incidence of SGA as per birth weight was comparable across the three growth charts.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Obstetric emergencies that occur during labor, often present as a major indication for prompt completion of labor by instrumental methods or emergency cesarean section. The purpose of this study was to present the clinical features of emergencies, the evolution of labor, maternal and fetal or neonatal complications at patients with SARS-COV-2 infection. Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective study that included 150 pregnant women who gave birth in Bucur Maternity, St John Hospital, Bucharest, between 2018-2020 that fulfilled the features of obstetrical emergency during labor and SARS-CoV-2 infection. The study group was divided in patients positive for SARS-CoV-2 and negative for SARS-CoV-2. Results: Following PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 were 26.67% of patients positive and 73.33% had a negative result. Analyzing the data obtained from this group of patients, it resulted that the average hospitalization is higher in the positive group (7.05 days) versus the negative group (5.47 days). The average gestational age at birth of SARS-CoV-2 positive patients was 37.26 weeks, lower than the gestational age of neonates from uninfected mothers (38.41 weeks). The average of the APGAR scores in the COVID group is 8.41, and for the negative group is 8.90. Conclusions: The associated SARS-CoV-2 infection played a significant role in terms of the APGAR score and the early peripartum outcomes of new-borns, negatively influencing the value of the APGAR index. Gestational age was considerably lower in patients diagnosed with the infection. The SARS-CoV-2 virus infection has a significant influence in unsatisfactory neonatal outcomes compared to new-borns of healthy mothers.
ABSTRACT
Background: Recent studies describe increasing rates of cannabis use among pregnant women. Gestational cannabis use has been associated with adverse neonatal outcomes and maternal reports of domestic violence. Domestic violence reportedly increased in Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic. We examined trends and outcomes of gestational cannabis use before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and sought associations with domestic violence. Method(s): The study population comprised women who attended the antenatal clinic and childbirth between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2021 at an Australian tertiary hospital. Maternal socio-demographic, pregnancy progress and neonatal outcomes were recorded from the clinical records. We sought associations between maternal cannabis use and self-reported domestic violence during the study period, and the relationship with pregnancy outcomes. Result(s): Cannabis use was reported by 165/10,263 (1.6%) pregnant women. Cannabis use remained consistent during the study period, but reports of domestic violence increased from 2.9% pre-COVID to 6.7% during the COVID-19 pandemic. During the pandemic, women with gestational cannabis use were more likely to be young (40% <25 years vs. 11.8% .25 years), underweight (3.5% vs. 2.4%) and reported more domestic violence (33.0% vs. 6.3%), compared with non-users. The most common co-consumed substances by cannabis-users were tobacco (63.5%), alcohol (13.9%) and amphetamines (9.6%). Gestational cannabis use was associated with smaller neonates (median birth weight 2900 vs. 3330 g), higher preterm births (33% vs. 8.6%) and increased stillbirths (1.7% vs. 0.4%) Conclusion(s): Although domestic violence increased, gestational cannabis use remained constant during the COVID-19 pandemic and was associated with worse neonatal outcomes.
ABSTRACT
Background: COVID-19 infection during pregnancy is associated with increased rates of adverse perinatal outcomes. The mechanism by which this occurs is not understood. We have previously reported increased rates of placental histopathological lesions in these pregnancies. Aim(s): We hypothesise that, 1. trimester of infection, and 2. vaccination status, affects placental histopathology and neonatal outcomes. Method(s): Pregnant women infected with COVID-19 between January 2020 and May 2022 were retrospectively identified from Monash Health records. Maternal and neonatal data were collected alongside placental histopathological changes as categorised by the Amsterdam Criteria. Result(s): 942/21838 women had COVID-19 infection during pregnancy. Placental histopathology was available in 638 cases. Analysis of infection by trimester revealed that earlier infection was associated with increased preterm birth rate (13.5% vs. 10.3% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.0012), reduced birth weight (3108 vs. 3216 vs. 3345 g, P = 0.0061) and increased fetal loss rate (2.7% vs. 1.8% vs. 0%, P = 0.0023, in T1 vs. T2 vs. T3, respectively) (Table 1). Placental weight increased with trimester of infection (416 vs. 469 vs. 487 g, P = 0.0267). There were no differences in histopathological lesions. 300 patients were unvaccinated (>=1 dose) versus 642 double vaccinated (>=2 doses) against COVID-19 (Table 2). Double vaccination resulted in fewer placental histopathological lesions (59.0% vs. 69.9%, P = 0.0089), particularly maternal vascular malperfusion lesions (20.7% vs. 28.2%, P = 0.0127) but no difference in perinatal outcomes. Conclusion(s): COVID-19 infection earlier in pregnancy is associated with poorer perinatal outcomes. Vaccination reduced the rate of placental lesions but did not change adverse neonatal outcomes.
ABSTRACT
COVID-19 has affected the population worldwide drastically with a tremendous impact on obstetric population which has led to serious concerns regarding maternal and fetal outcomes. Although there are recommended guidelines regarding delivery and management of complications, due to changes in characteristics of COVID-19 infection, they are constantly changing and evolving. Method(s): Prospective cohort study done during the covid pandemic from 1st April 2020 to 15th Feb 2022 in the department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, SKIMS MCH Srinagar J&K. The parameters measured were severity of covid disease, maternal age, gestational age, parity, blood investigations, mode of delivery, APGAR score, neonatal infection status and post-delivery complications. Result(s): A total of 311 pregnant covid 19 positive patients were included in the study who were actively managed.239 (76.85%) were delivered by casearean section and 72 (23.15%) by NVD. 92% patients had mild symptoms only, 8% had severe symptoms with 1.6% rate of ICU admission and 1.2% mortality rate. 83% delivered at term, 17% had preterm deliveries.8% patients had pneumonitis with positive findings on CT scan.24% patients had anemia, 12% had GDM, 10% had PIH, 10% had IHCOP, 5% had PPH, 1.6% had APH. All the neonates were negative for covid 19. 80% babies had an APGAR score of >= 8/10 at 1 min of birth with a mean birth weight of 2400 g +/- 500. No postdelivery complication was noted. Conclusion(s): Our study concludes that SARS-CoV-2 infection can lead to unfavorable maternal and perinatal outcomes.
ABSTRACT
Purpose of Study: Pregnant women are at considerable risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Mother-to-child-transmission can occur, in-utero, perinatally or postnatally with significant complications in the newborn. Little is known on impact of SARS-CoV-2 on newborn infants. Our objectives were to describe maternal and neonatal outcomes among those with SARS-CoV-2 infection since beginning of the pandemic. Methods Used: This was a retrospective review of data from a single center with level III NICU from April 2020 through March 2022 in Los Angeles, CA. The study included pregnant women who were screened at delivery and/or during pregnancy and tested positive with PCR test. Data of these women and their infants were reviewed from medical records. Institutional IRB approval was obtained to review the data. Summary of Results: During the study period 152 mothers were SARs-CoV-2 positive in pregnancy or at delivery. Maternal risk factors included obesity (13.2%), pre-eclampsia (15.1%) and diabetes (19.7%). Fourteen (9.2%) were symptomatic for 0-7 days prior to delivery predominantly with cough, fever and myalgia. Majority (58.7%) delivered vaginally. SARS-CoV-2 exposed infants had a median gestational age of 38.3 weeks;35 (23%) were preterm. Median birthweight was 3120 grams and 32 infants 31 (20.5%) were low birthweight. Thirty-one (20.4%) infants needed resuscitation at delivery. Common symptoms for infants included respiratory symptoms (22.4%), hyperbilirubinemia (15.1%) and hypoglycemia (7.2%). Sixty-eight infants (44.7%) required admission to NICU. Majority of the infants (130) had PCR tests at 24 hours and 48 hours if still hospitalized. Five (3.8%) were PCR+: 4 at 24 hours and 1 at 48 hours. Another 5 infants had positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2 in infancy. Conclusion(s): SARS-CoV-2 infection was present at delivery in a significant number of pregnant women with 3.8 % of their infants. Although a majority of women were asymptomatic at the time of delivery, there was significant morbidity among women with pre-eclampsia and diabetes. Newborn morbidity included prematurity, low birth weight and respiratory distress even in PCR- newborns. These data emphasize the need for screening all pregnant women for SARS-CoV-2 at delivery, and close monitoring of mother-infant dyad if infected. Vaccination of pregnant women should be encouraged.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Birth outcomes could have been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic through changes in access to prenatal services and other pathways. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on fetal death, birth weight, gestational age, number of prenatal visits, and caesarean delivery in 2020 in Colombia. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of data on 3,140,010 pregnancies and 2,993,534 live births from population-based birth certificate and fetal death certificate records in Colombia between 2016 and 2020. Outcomes were compared separately for each month during 2020 with the same month in 2019 and pre-pandemic trends were examined in regression models controlling for maternal age, educational level, marital status, type of health insurance, place of residence (urban/rural), municipality of birth, and the number of pregnancies the mother has had before last pregnancy. RESULTS: We found some evidence for a decline in miscarriage risk in some months after the pandemic start, while there was an apparent lagging increase in stillbirth risk, although not statistically significant after correction for multiple comparisons. Birth weight increased during the onset of the pandemic, a change that does not appear to be driven by pre-pandemic trends. Specifically, mean birth weight was higher in 2020 than 2019 for births in April through December by about 12 to 21 g (p < 0.01). There was also a lower risk of gestational age at/below 37 weeks in 2020 for two months following the pandemic (April, June), but a higher risk in October. Finally, there was a decline in prenatal visits in 2020 especially in June-October, but no evidence of a change in C-section delivery. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings suggest mixed early effects of the pandemic on perinatal outcomes and prenatal care utilization in Colombia. While there was a significant decline in prenatal visits, other factors may have had counter effects on perinatal health including an increase in birth weight on average.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Vital Statistics , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Prenatal Care , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Pandemics , Birth Weight , Colombia/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on preterm birth (PB) and low birth weight (LBW), comparing public and private healthcare systems of the National Integrated Health System in Uruguay, where the mitigation measures for the COVID-19 pandemic generated an immediate socioeconomic and psychological crisis, which caused a sharp widening of existing socioeconomic inequalities. METHODS: A national observational study was conducted comparing perinatal outcomes in the first 6 months of 2020 (period of the pandemic without pregnancy infections), which was the beginning of the pandemic, with the same period of the previous year 2019 (pre-pandemic period with no mitigation measures) among pregnant women from the public and private health systems. Data were retrieved from the national database (Informatic Perinatal System) and analyzed by healthcare system category. RESULTS: A total of 36 559 deliveries were assessed: 18 563 in the 2019 study period and 17 996 in the 2020 study period. In the public system, there was a significant increase in the risk of LBW (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.36) and of the composite outcome (PB or LBW) (aRR 1.15, 95% CI 1.04-1.26). In the private system, by contrast, there was a non-statistically significant decrease of LBW and there were no changes in the incidence of PB and the composite outcome in 2020. CONCLUSION: The different evolution of birth outcomes in the public and private systems suggests an unequal impact of mitigation measures on populations of different socioeconomic levels. Given that no COVID-19 infections were identified in pregnant women during the study period, this research offers an opportunity to differentiate the biologic effects of the virus from the psychological and social impacts derived from containment measures. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT05087160.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Pregnancy-related acute kidney injury (PR-AKI) in India is largely showing a declining trend due to improved and accessible obstetric care. Nevertheless, PR-AKI continues to cause significant maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. This study was taken up with the intention to study the incidence and clinical spectrum of AKI in pregnancy in recent times and assess maternal and neonatal outcomes Methods: All pregnant women admitted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at St John's Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru between January 2018 to June 2020 were screened for AKI with the following criteria 1. Increase in serum creatinine to >0.8mg/dL and/or a sudden increase in serum creatinine by more than 50% when prior renal function was normal. 2. Oligo-anuria 3. Need for renal replacement therapy Women with preexisting CKD were excluded. Patient's clinical and laboratory details recorded. Dialysis support was provided if indicated. The clinical profile and renal outcome of the mother and fetal outcome was assessed at the time of discharge. Mothers' were also followed up at the end of 3 months of postpartum period. Recovery was categorized as Complete recovery- normal serum creatinine (<0.8 mg/dL) or a previously known baseline and no proteinuria /hypertension at the end of 3 months Partial recovery- renal function improved but serum creatinine did not return to normal range and patient was dialysis independent. No recovery- patient continued to require dialysis at the end of 3months. Result(s): Of the 2650 deliveries in the study period 42 women (Mean age 26.9 +/-3.6 years) were diagnosed AKI during pregnancy (1.58%). Baseline characteristics and outcomes are depicted in table 1. Majority of women (n=37) were referred from peripheral hospitals. Hypertension and decreased fetal movements were the common reasons for referral. Third trimester was the most common time of presentation (76.1%). Severe Preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome was the leading cause of AKI (59.5%).ATN secondary to obstetric complications, sepsis and hemolytic uremic syndrome were the other causes. One case each of cortical necrosis, acute fatty liver of pregnancy and COVID 19 associated AKI was seen. Mean duration of hospital stay was 12.1+/-6.9 days. More than one third patients' required ICU stay (35.7%).12 patients (28.5%) required renal replacement therapy. Of them, 3 were dialysis dependent at the end of 3 months and 4 had partial renal recovery. 3 patients expired during hospital stay. Fetal survival was 69.04%.13 babies' required NICU care (44.8%). Neonatal outcomes are summarized in table 2. Close to one third of the pregnancies with AKI were associated with intrauterine fetal demise (28.5%). Low birth weight and prematurity were the common reasons for NICU admission with mean NICU stay of 8.2 +/-2.3 days [Formula presented] [Formula presented] Conclusion(s): Severe preeclampsia was the most common cause of AKI in our study. PR-AKI continues to be a significant problem in the peripheries of developing countries where availability of health care facilities is meager, with late referral to tertiary care centers. One third of the patients required ICU stay & dialytic support. Women who required dialysis had poorer renal prognosis. There was 30% fetal loss seen in PR-AKI and also a higher incidence of low birth weight and prematurity. No conflict of interestCopyright © 2023